Educational Community License Version 1.0 : Différence entre versions
m (a renommé Educational Community License en Educational Community License Version 1.0) |
|||
| Ligne 4 : | Ligne 4 : | ||
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ecl1.txt | http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ecl1.txt | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Discussion ML OSI == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | Title: Educational Community License (ECL 2.0): | ||
| + | Submission: | ||
| + | http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:sss:12757:200705:pinhehafopjimikjkpki | ||
| + | and the submittor's summary of discussion: | ||
| + | http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:sss:12794:200705:cljjpgeldckepijfbgjb | ||
| + | |||
| + | License: | ||
| + | https://www.collabtools.org/access/content/user/chris.coppola@rsmart.com/ecl2.txt | ||
| + | but it's easier to read the version resubmitted here: | ||
| + | http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:msp:12746:pinhehafopjimikjkpki | ||
| + | |||
| + | Comments: This license is one sentence short of being Apache. They | ||
| + | plan to retire the ECL 1.1 when this license is approved. Brian | ||
| + | objects in principle but understands why they're not Apache. Matt | ||
| + | points out that implicit patent grant in "use" of 1.1 is greater than | ||
| + | explicit grant in 2.0. | ||
| + | Recommend: approval, replacement of ECL 1.1</blockquote> | ||
Version du 24 mai 2008 à 13:02
| ' ' V. Version:=1.0 | |
|---|---|
| System : | [[System::{{{System}}}]] |
| Domaine : | [[Domaine::{{{Domaine}}}]] |
| Type : | [[Type::{{{Type}}}]] |
| Genre : | [[Genre::{{{Genre}}}]] |
| Auteur : | [[Auteur::{{{Auteur}}}]] |
|
[{{{Source}}} Texte] | |
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/ecl1.txt
Discussion ML OSI
Title: Educational Community License (ECL 2.0): Submission: http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:sss:12757:200705:pinhehafopjimikjkpki and the submittor's summary of discussion: http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:sss:12794:200705:cljjpgeldckepijfbgjb
License: https://www.collabtools.org/access/content/user/chris.coppola@rsmart.com/ecl2.txt but it's easier to read the version resubmitted here: http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:msp:12746:pinhehafopjimikjkpki
Comments: This license is one sentence short of being Apache. They plan to retire the ECL 1.1 when this license is approved. Brian objects in principle but understands why they're not Apache. Matt points out that implicit patent grant in "use" of 1.1 is greater than explicit grant in 2.0.
Recommend: approval, replacement of ECL 1.1
